- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Iowa v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Iowa v. Securities & Exchange Commission
National Legal & Policy Center v. Securities & Exchange Commission ↗
24-60147United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (5th Cir.)3 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
03/29/2024
Petitioners filed unopposed emergency motion to transfer.
Motion
03/21/2024
Petition for review filed.
Petition
01/01/2024
Filing Year For Action
Filing Year For Action
Sierra Club v. U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission ↗
24-1067United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
03/13/2024
Petition for review filed by Sierra Club and Sierra Club Foundation.
Petition
01/01/2024
Filing Year For Action
Filing Year For Action
Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation v. Securities & Exchange Commission ↗
24-3220United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (6th Cir.)2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
03/13/2024
Petition for review filed.
Petition
01/01/2024
Filing Year For Action
Filing Year For Action
Iowa v. Securities & Exchange Commission ↗
24-1522, 24-1623, 24-1624, 24-1626, 24-1627, 24-1628, 24-1631, 24-1633, 24-1634, 24-1685United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (8th Cir.)76 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
05/21/2026
Petitioners' motion to lift abeyance denied.
Decision
05/18/2026
Opposition filed by intervenor states to petitioners' consolidated motion to lift abeyance.
states that had intervened to defend the climate disclosure rules filed their opposition to the motion to lift abeyance. They argued that continuing to hold the case in abeyance while the SEC conducts its rulemaking process would be consistent with customary administrative practice. They also contended that maintaining the abeyance would not prejudice the petitioners since the rules would continue to be stayed. The states also argued that the court was not required to take action “based on SEC’s say-so” and that, in any event, the SEC had not conceded an APA violation. The intervenor states also argued that denying the motion to lift the abeyance would not result in an abeyance that exceeded abeyances in other cases.
Opposition
05/08/2026
Petitioners filed consolidated motion requesting that the court lift the abeyance and resolve the petitions for review.
On May 8, 2026, the petitioners challenging the SEC's climate disclosure rules filed a motion to lift the abeyance that the Eighth Circuit instituted in September 2025. The petitioners argued that the court should accept the SEC’s “concession” that the rules violate the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and either vacate the rule and remand to the SEC or schedule oral argument.
Motion
05/07/2026
Letter submitted by SEC to inform court that it had determined to reconsider the rules.
In the proceedings challenging the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) 2024 climate disclosure rules, the SEC on May 7, 2026 informed the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals that it had decided to reconsider the rules and had submitted a proposed rescission rule to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs for review. The SEC’s letter said the proposed rule would address legal and policy concerns about the rules, including concerns that they exceeded the SEC’s statutory authority and that the costs of the rules outweighed their benefits.
Letter
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission ↗
24-707United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (2d Cir.)2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
03/12/2024
Petition for review filed.
Petition
01/01/2024
Filing Year For Action
Filing Year For Action
West Virginia v. U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission ↗
24-10679United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (11th Cir.)2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
03/06/2024
Petition for review filed.
Petition
01/01/2024
Filing Year For Action
Filing Year For Action
Liberty Energy, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange Commission ↗
24-60109United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (5th Cir.)9 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
03/22/2024
Administrative stay dissolved and petition transferred to the Eighth Circuit.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals granted an administrative stay of the rule on March 15 in the case brought by two oilfield services companies; the Fifth Circuit then dissolved the stay after the Eighth Circuit was selected as the venue for the litigation.
Decision
03/15/2024
Liberty Energy, Inc. and Nomad Proppant Services, L.L.C.’s motion for an administrative stay granted.
Decision
03/14/2024
Petition for review filed by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Texas Association of Business, and Longview Chamber of Commerce.
Petition
03/13/2024
Opposition filed by SEC to emergency motion for administrative stay and stay pending judicial review.
Opposition