Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

National Wildlife Refuge Association v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

National Wildlife Refuge Association v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 

5:23-cv-00080United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia (S.D. Ga.)3 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
09/13/2023
Action dismissed with prejudice pursuant to joint stipulation.
The court dismissed the case with prejudice pursuant to a joint stipulation by the parties. Bloomberg Law reported that the plaintiffs' counsel said they dismissed the case because it was rendered moot by the U.S. Supreme Court's Sackett v. EPA decision regarding the scope of "waters of the United States."
Decision
09/08/2023
Parties stipulated to the dismissal of action with prejudice with no concessions as to the merits of plaintiffs’ claims.
Stipulation
01/01/2022
Filing Year For Action
Filing Year For Action

National Wildlife Refuge Association v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 

1:22-cv-03498United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.D.C.)6 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
08/07/2023
Motion to transfer to the Southern District of Georgia granted.
The federal district court for the District of Columbia granted a motion by the developer of a heavy mineral-sands mine in Georgia to transfer a case challenging jurisdictional determinations for the project to the Southern District of Georgia. The court found that venue was proper in the Southern District of Georgia and that the interests of convenience and justice supported transfer. The court found that the challenge to the mine was “an intensely local controversy” and that the localized interests were “preeminent.”
Decision
05/24/2023
Response filed by plaintiffs in opposition to motion to transfer.
Response
05/22/2023
Response
05/08/2023
Motion to transfer to the Southern District of Georgia filed by defendant-intervenor Twin Pines Minerals, LLC.
Motion