Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Natural Resources Defense Council v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 

22-1145United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
07/29/2022
Motion for leave to intervene in support of petitioners filed by Clean Fuels Development Coalition et al.
Motion To Intervene

Texas v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 

22-1144United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
08/01/2022
Motion to intervene in support of respondents filed by National Coalition for Advanced Transportation and Zero Emission Transportation Association.
Motion To Intervene

Natural Resources Defense Council v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 

22-1080United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)27 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
09/05/2023
Response filed by respondents to supplemental authority (American Public Gas Association v. Department of Energy).
Response
08/30/2023
Letter filed by American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers and state petitioners regarding supplemental authority (American Public Gas Association v. Department of Energy).
Letter
08/29/2023
Court issued order regarding format of oral argument.
On September 14, 2023, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral argument in challenges to EPA’s greenhouse gas emissions standards for light-duty vehicles for 2023 and later model years and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA’s) fuel economy standards for model years 2024-2026. The oral argument regarding the EPA standards will focus on whether petitioners’ arguments are properly before the court, whether EPA’s rule is authorized under Section 202 of the Clean Air Act, and whether EPA’s rule is arbitrary and capricious. The oral argument regarding the fuel economy standards will focus on Energy Policy and Conservation Act preemption issues and arguments that NHTSA improperly considered factors such as the fuel economy of electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid vehicles. A portion of the argument will also address issues regarding NHTSA’s treatment of high-compression-ratio Atkinson-enabled engines.
Decision
06/23/2023
Decision