Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Sierra Club v. EPA

Center for Biological Diversity v. EPA 

10-1388United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
11/16/2010
Order issued severing and consolidating case.
The D.C. Circuit directed that the claim involving timing issues in this challenge to EPA's final Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule be severed and consolidated with other pending cases challenging former EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson's December 2008 interpretive memo and EPA's reconsideration of the memo.
Petition
08/30/2010
Statement

Sierra Club v. EPA 

10-1215United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
08/02/2010
Petition for review filed.
Sierra Club filed a lawsuit challenging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) final Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule to the extent it codified former EPA Administrator Johnson's interpretive memo governing when pollutants become “subject to regulation” under the Clean Air Act. Sierra Club noted that it had intervened to defend other aspects of the rule in industry lawsuits challenging the final rule.
Petition

Center for Biological Diversity v. EPA 

10-1115United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
05/28/2010
Petition for review filed.
Center for Biological Diversity filed a petition for review challenging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) reconsideration of the interpretive memorandum issued by former EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson in December 2008.
Petition

Sierra Club v. EPA 

09-1018United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)6 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
07/17/2014
Joint stipulation of dismissal filed.
Stipulation
11/16/2010
Order issued consolidating Nos. 10-1115, 10-1215, and 10-1388 with these cases and holding cases in abeyance pending further order of the court.
Decision
09/14/2010
Order issued directing that cases continue to be held in abeyance to allow other pending proceedings that may affect the outcome to proceed.
Motion
06/09/2010
Motion to govern further proceedings filed by EPA.
Motion

California v. EPA 

09-1088United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
03/02/2009
Petition