Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Swartz v. Coca-Cola Co.

Sierra Club v. Coca-Cola Co. 

3:21-cv-04644United States District Court for the Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.)2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
09/27/2021
Motion To Dismiss
06/16/2021
Complaint

Swartz v. Coca-Cola Co. 

3:21-cv-04643United States District Court for the Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.)14 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
08/17/2023
Second amended complaint filed.
Complaint
07/27/2023
Motion to dismiss granted with leave to amend.
The federal district court for the Northern District of California ruled that plaintiffs alleging that Coca-Cola Company and two other defendants’ misled consumers with claims that their beverage bottles were “100% recyclable” did not plausibly state claims under California law. The court granted the plaintiffs what “will likely be the final opportunity to amend” to attempt to state a plausible claim. On August 17, 2023, the plaintiffs filed a second amended consolidated complaint that alleges that the addition of “100%” to “Recyclable” “suggests to consumers that the Products exceed the ordinary standard of ‘Recyclability.’”
Decision
02/13/2023
Reply filed in support of motion to dismiss first amended complaint.
Reply
01/30/2023
Plaintiffs filed opposition to motion to dismiss first amended complaint.
Opposition