- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Australia
- /
- 0907346 [2009] RRTA 1168
0907346 [2009] RRTA 1168
About this case
Filing year
2009
Status
Decided
Geography
Court/admin entity
Australia → Refugee Review Tribunal
Case category
Suits against governments (Global) → Human Rights (Global) → Climate migration (Global)
Principal law
Australia → Migration Act 1958
At issue
Whether an applicant for a visa was owed protection from sea level rise under the Migration Act and Refugee Convention
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
Summary
The applicant sought review of the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship delegate’s decision to refuse to grant the applicant a Protection (Class XA) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958. The applicant claimed to be a citizen of Kirbati, which is a pacific country made of a series of islands threatened by sea level rise. The applicant had last arrived in Australia in December 2007 and applied for the visa in May 2009. The delegate decided to refuse the visa in August 2009. The applicant applied for a review of the decision in September 2009.
Australia is a party to the Refugees Convention, which defines a refugee as: being outside his country; fearing persecution involving serious harm and systematic and discriminatory conduct; fearing that persecution because of his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion; and having that fear be well-founded.
The applicant claimed that some of the Kirbati islands are disappearing due to climate change and sea-level rise, and the future of the country is disappearing due to climate change. The applicant claimed that the main livelihood is ruined and destroyed on the islands, as well as the freshwater supply. The Court found that the continued production of carbon emissions that cause climate change is not sufficient to constitute persecution under the Refugee Convention in a decision issued on December 10, 2009 as there was no evidence that the persecution the applicant was fearing was occurring because of his membership to any particular group.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance