- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Alaska
- /
- Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority v. U.S. Department of the Interior
Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority v. U.S. Department of the Interior
Geography
Year
2023
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2023
Status
Notice of appeal filed by Gwich'in Steering Committee.
Geography
Docket number
3:24-cv-00051
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Alaska (D. Alaska)
Case category
Constitutional Claims (US) → Fifth Amendment (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Fifth Amendment—Due ProcessUnited States → Naval Petroleum Reserves Production ActUnited States → Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
At issue
Challenge to the Biden administration's cancellation of the plaintiff's oil and gas leases for the Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
05/16/2025
Notice of appeal filed by Gwich'in Steering Committee.
Appeal
–
03/25/2025
Lease cancellation vacated.
The federal district court for the District of Alaska vacated the Biden administration’s September 2023 cancellation of Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge oil and gas leases. The Biden administration had canceled the leases—which were entered into at the end of the first Trump administration—based on the U.S. Department of the Interior’s conclusion that the leases were “unlawful in the inception” due to legal defects in the environmental review, including failure to adequately quantify downstream greenhouse gas emissions. In its decision vacating the cancellation, the court held that the Interior Department failed to follow the procedure mandated by the implementing regulations of the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976 for lease cancellations, which require a court order and which the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act made applicable to the ANWR Coastal Plain oil and gas program.
Decision
–
01/15/2025
Plaintiff filed response to defendants' status report.
The plaintiff filed a response to the defendants' status report regarding the ANWR oil and gas lease sale for which no bids were received by the deadline of January 6, 2025. The plaintiff contested the Department of the Interior's attribution for the lack of interest to recognition by industry that ANWR is too environmentally sensitive for oil drilling. The plaintiff stated: "DOI is mistaken. No one bid in the second ANWR oil and gas sale because DOI rewrote the operational rules so restrictively that no one could viably bid." The plaintiff further stated that it "stands ready and willing to conduct lawful, environmentally-appropriate oil and gas activities if the Court overturns DOI’s unlawful cancellation of the leases that DOI issued AIDEA in January 2021 in the first lease sale, to fulfill the mandate of the Tax Act."
Response
–
01/08/2025
Status report filed by defendants regarding oil and gas lease sale.
Status Report
–
Summary
Challenge to the Biden administration's cancellation of the plaintiff's oil and gas leases for the Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance