Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. v. EPA

About this case

Filing year
2016
Status
Petitions for review denied.
Docket number
16-1052 et al.
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)United StatesUnited States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)Clean Air Act (US)Industry Lawsuits (US)Renewable Fuel Standards (US)
Principal law
United StatesClean Air Act (CAA)
At issue
Challenge to EPA Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) rulemakings.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
08/30/2019
Petitions for review denied.
The D.C. Circuit rejected a set of challenges to Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program rules. First, the court upheld the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) denial of petitions to reconsider its 2010 “point of obligation” rule that imposed RFS compliance obligations on refiners and importers but not on blenders. Second, the court upheld EPA’s decision not to reassess categories of “obligated parties” when it issued the 2017 annual standards. Third, the court rejected challenges to EPA’s cellulosic biofuel projection for 2017 and the decision not to use the entirety of the discretionary cellulosic waiver to lower the 2017 requirements for advanced biofuel and total renewable fuel. Fourth, the court rejected a claim that the 2018 volume for biomass-based diesel was too low.
Decision

Summary

Challenge to EPA Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) rulemakings.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance