Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Anderson v. City and County of San Francisco

About this case

Filing year
2005
Status
Opinion issued reversing trial court's ruling for respondents.
Docket number
A129910
Court/admin entity
United StatesState CourtsCalifornia Court of Appeals (Cal. Ct. App.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US)State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United StatesCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Challenge to city bike plan, including on grounds that it did not analyze greenhouse gas impacts.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
01/14/2013
Opinion issued reversing trial court's ruling for respondents.
An individual challenged an environmental impact report (EIR) prepared in conjunction with an update of San Francisco’s bike plan on numerous grounds, including that the report failed to properly analyze the increased amounts of GHG emissions caused by several aspects of the plan, including allegedly degraded intersections that would increase car idling.  This court affirmed the dismissal of this and other issues, holding that the lower court properly concluded that the EIR properly addressed these.  However, the court did remand the case given that the EIR failed to make a finding of infeasibility with respect to certain mitigation measures.
Decision

Summary

Challenge to city bike plan, including on grounds that it did not analyze greenhouse gas impacts.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience