Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Asmania et al. vs Holcim

Geography
Year
2022
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2022
Status
Pending
Court/admin entity
SwitzerlandCantonal Court of Zug
Case category
Suits against corporations, individualsCorporationsClimate damageGHG emissions reduction
Principal law
At issue
Civil liability of major GHG emitter for climate change-related damages suffered in a different jurisdiction; financing of anti-flooding measures; GHG emissions reductions
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results

Summary

Four inhabitants of the Indonesian island of Pari have sued Swiss-based major buildings materials company Holcim (from 2015 to 2021: Lafarge Holcim). In July 2022, they filed a request for conciliation before the Justice of the Peace of the Canton of Zug, Switzerland. This is a necessary step required by the Swiss Civil Procedure Code. The plaintiffs are supported by three NGOs: HEKS/EPER (Switzerland), the European Center for Constitutional and European Rights (ECCHR) and WALHI (Indonesia). The plaintiffs request: • proportional compensation for climate change-related damages on Pari • reduction of CO2 emissions by 43 % by 2030 and by 69% by 2040, relative to 2019 levels • financial contribution to adaptation measures on Pari The claim can be seen as novel and unprecedented as it combines two approaches: reduction of GHGs and compensation. On February 1, 2023, following a Conciliation Hearing before the Justice of the Peace in October 2022 where no settlement was reached, the NGOs supporting the plaintiffs announced that the plaintiffs had formally lodged a lawsuit against Holcim with the Cantolnal Court of Zug (Kantonsgericht Zug). In October 2023, Cantonal Court of Zug granted the plaintiffs’ request for free legal aid (art. 117 et seq Civil Procedure Code). According to a press release of HEKS, the judge held that the two requirements for granting free legal aid, (a) insufficient sufficient funds to pay for legal cost and (b) the legal petition does not seem to be lacking any chance of success, were met. The legal basis on which the plaintiffs rely is Article 28 of the Swiss Civil Code (infringement of personal rights) and Article 41 of the Code of Obligations (redress for unjust harm). As to Holcim's historical emissions, the plaintiffs rely on a Study by Richard Heede/Climate Accountability Institute. Note: Case documents are currently not available - the information presented here is based on media releases of the NGOs that support the plaintiffs. More detailed information is not available at this time.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Risk
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector