- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Australia
- /
- Australian Conservation Foundation Incorporated v Woodside Energy Ltd & Anor
Australian Conservation Foundation Incorporated v Woodside Energy Ltd & Anor
About this case
Filing year
2022
Status
Pending
Geography
Court/admin entity
Australia → Federal Court of Australia
Case category
Suits against corporations, individuals (Global) → Corporations (Global) → Environmental assessment and permitting (Global)
Principal law
Australia → Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth)
At issue
Whether the Scarborough gas project should be subject to approval under Australia’s national environment law.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
06/21/2022
Originating Application dated 21 June 2022
Application
–
06/21/2022
Concise Statement dated 21 June 2022
Other
–
Summary
Scarborough is a proposed new gas project off the north-west coast of Western Australia that would cause an estimated 1.37 billion tonnes of greenhouse pollution over the next 25 years. Although the gas would be extracted off the coast of WA and much of it burned overseas, it would affect the Great Barrier Reef in Queensland by fuelling climate change, which is causing repeated coral bleaching events on the reef. Scarborough has never been approved under Australia’s federal environment protection law - the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (EPBC Act) - because offshore gas and oil projects are assessed in a streamlined process by the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) and exempt from the EPBC Act’s operation. However, that exemption does not apply if an offshore project is likely to have a significant impact on the World or National Heritage values of the Great Barrier Reef. The applicant, the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) believes the greenhouse gas emissions that will result from the Scarborough project are likely to have a significant impact on the Great Barrier Reef. Accordingly, the ACF will argue this means the project should not be allowed to proceed unless the project – and its impacts on the reef – are approved under the EPBC Act.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Finance