Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Mercer Superannuation (Australia) Limited

Geography
Year
2023
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2023
Status
Decided
Court/admin entity
AustraliaFederal Court of Australia
Case category
Suits against corporations, individuals (Global)Corporations (Global)Misleading advertising (Global)
Principal law
AustraliaAustralian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth)
At issue
Whether Mercer's presentation of "Sustainable Plus" investment was false and misleading, contravening the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 §§ 12DB(1)(a), 12DF(1), when the investment options had exposures to companies involving extraction or sale of carbon intensive fossil fuels, production of alcohol, and gambling, contrary to the statements of Mercer.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results

Summary

The case was filed on Sept. 13, 2023, by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission ("ASIC") against Mercer Superannuation (Australia) Limited ("Mercer"), alleging that Mercer violated the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 ("ASIC Act") §§ 12DB(1)(a), 12DF(1). The sections respectively ban false or misleading representations in trade, and conduct that "is liable to mislead the public as to . . . the suitability for their purpose . . . of any financial services." Mercer, in offering a category of investment options known as the “Sustainable Plus” investment options, published online videos during four different periods between Nov. 12, 2021, and Mar. 1, 2023, and posted three website statements for some overlapping and continuous periods covering Jan. 25, 2022, to Mar. 1, 2023. The published materials described the "Sustainable Plus" option as "exclud[ing] companies involved in alcohol production, carbon intensive fossil fuels, gambling and pornography." The statements were available with other statements emphasizing the sustainability and ESG credentials of Mercer. However, from Nov. 12, 2021, to Mar. 1, 2023, the "Sustainable Plus" option had exposure to up to 15 companies involved in the extraction or sale of carbon-intensive fossil fuels, 15 companies involved in the production of alcohol, and 19 companies involved in gambling. Mercer admitted the contraventions of the ASIC Act arising from its statements. As a result, the parties jointly sought to resolve the case by pecuniary penalties, adverse publicity orders, and costs orders. Based on the agreement, Justice Horan ordered, on Aug. 2, 2024, that Mercer pay a penalty of $11,300,000, pay the cost of proceedings, and publish a notice about their false and misleading conduct on its website for 6 months. In explaining its orders, the court additionally acknowledged that conduct of this kind is "greenwashing," which is a "key regulatory and enforcement priority by regulators."

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance