- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Arizona
- /
- Borteanu v. Nikola Corp.
Borteanu v. Nikola Corp.
About this case
Filing year
2020
Status
Motions to dismiss granted in part and denied in part.
Geography
Docket number
2:20-cv-01797-SPL
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Case category
Securities and Financial Regulation (US)
Principal law
United States → Securities Act of 1933/Securities Exchange Act of 1934
At issue
Plaintiffs claim that the Nikola Corporation misrepresented their business, including by making false claims related to hydrogen energy.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
12/08/2023
Motions to dismiss granted in part and denied in part.
The federal district court for the District of Arizona granted in part and denied in part motions to dismiss investors’ lawsuit contending that Nikola and individual defendants misrepresented the company's business operations to inflate their stock value. The court found that the plaintiff sufficiently alleged that the company and some of the individual defendants made material misstatements in their Securities and Exchange Commission filings. The court also found that allegations regarding scienter and loss causation against the company and individual defendants were sufficient for a "maker liability" claim. In addition, a claim for "scheme liability" survived against the company and three individual defendants.
Decision
–
04/03/2023
Second consolidated amended class action complaint filed.
Complaint
–
09/15/2020
Complaint filed.
Investors filed a class action lawsuit in federal court in Arizona, alleging that Nikola Corporation misrepresented numerous aspects of their business operations, inflating their stock value and ultimately causing significant damage to class members. Nikola Corporation designs and manufactures electric vehicles. The plaintiffs asserted that Nikola violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making numerous misrepresentations about their operations, including that they developed a “fully operational-emissions' tractor trailer truck powered by hydrogen fuel cell technology” and were “producing hydrogen at a fraction of the cost industry experts believed was possible.”
Complaint
–
Summary
Plaintiffs claim that the Nikola Corporation misrepresented their business, including by making false claims related to hydrogen energy.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance