- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Wisconsin
- /
- Braun v. Walsh
Braun v. Walsh
About this case
Filing year
2023
Status
Brief filed in support of motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order.
Geography
Docket number
23-cv-234
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin (E.D. Wis.)
Case category
Securities and Financial Regulation (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
At issue
Challenge to the U.S. Department of Labor’s final rule on “Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights” (the Investment Duties regulation).
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
02/28/2023
Brief filed in support of motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order.
Motion
–
02/21/2023
Complaint filed.
Two individual participants in retirement benefit plans subject to the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin challenging the U.S. Department of Labor’s final rule on “Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights.” The complaint alleged that the rule “both permits and encourages plan administrators to consider environmental, social, and governance [(ESG)]… factors when making investments on behalf of plan beneficiaries.” The plaintiffs asserted that the rule violated ERISA and exceeded the Secretary of Labor’s statutory authority. Their allegations included that the rule was “unsupported by substantial evidence because it is unsupported by any evidence reliably demonstrating that fiduciaries that consider ESG factors are acting in the sole interest of participants and beneficiaries, or that companies that consider ESG factors such as climate change and diversity programs drive higher financial returns.”
Complaint
–
Summary
Challenge to the U.S. Department of Labor’s final rule on “Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights” (the Investment Duties regulation).
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Finance