Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources Board

About this case

Filing year
2012
Status
Petitions for review denied.
Docket number
S241948
Court/admin entity
United StatesState CourtsCalifornia Supreme Court (Cal.)
Case category
Carbon Offsets and Credits (US)Regulatory (US)State Law Claims (US)Industry Lawsuits (US)
Principal law
United StatesCalifornia ConstitutionUnited StatesCalifornia Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32)United StatesState Constitutions
At issue
Challenge to auction of greenhouse gas allowances.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
06/28/2017
Petitions for review denied.
The California Supreme Court declined to review an intermediate appellate court’s decision upholding the statewide greenhouse gas cap-and-trade program. The plaintiffs in lawsuits challenging the cap-and-trade program had argued that it was not authorized by the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 and that the requirement to purchase emissions allowances constituted a tax that required approval by a two-thirds majority of the State legislature. The California Supreme Court denied three petitions for review.
Decision
06/12/2017
Answer filed by intervenors and respondents Natural Resources Defense Council and Environmental Defense Fund.
Answer
05/16/2017
Petition for review filed by National Association of Manufacturers.
Petition
05/15/2017
Petition for review filed by California Chamber of Commerce.
Three petitions were filed in the California Supreme Court seeking review of the California Court of Appeal decision that upheld the state’s cap-and-trade program for greenhouse gas emissions. The lead parties for the petitions were the California Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, and Morning Star Packing Company. All three petitions asked the Supreme Court to review the question of whether the auction of greenhouse gas emissions constituted a “tax” that would need the approval of two-thirds of the California legislature under Proposition 13. The California Chamber of Commerce also asked the Supreme Court to review whether the California Air Resources Board’s design of the cap-and-trade system was outside the authority granted to it by AB 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act.
Petition

Summary

Challenge to auction of greenhouse gas allowances.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance