Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

California Clean Energy Committee v. County of Placer

About this case

Filing year
2011
Status
Denial of petition for writ of mandate reversed.
Docket number
C072680
Court/admin entity
United StatesState CourtsCalifornia Court of Appeals (Cal. Ct. App.)
Case category
Carbon Offsets and Credits (US)Regulatory (US)State Law Claims (US)Environmentalist Lawsuits (US)State Law Claims (US)State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United StatesCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Challenge to ski resort expansion project.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
12/22/2015
Denial of petition for writ of mandate reversed.
In an unpublished opinion, the California Court of Appeal largely upheld Placer County’s approval of a plan to expand an existing ski resort at Lake Tahoe, but concluded that the approval was invalid under CEQA because the County failed to analyze wildfire evacuation risk. The court said that the petitioner had failed to establish CEQA violations related to any of the energy-related issues it raised—which included the energy impacts of increased snowmaking, energy conservation, transportation and equipment energy impacts, and renewable energy resources. The court also found that the petitioner had failed to exhaust administrative remedies regarding a claim that the environmental impact report did not contain substantial evidence to support the determination that carbon credits were not feasible mitigation measures.
Decision

Summary

Challenge to ski resort expansion project.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance