Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

California Natural Resources Agency v. Ross

About this case

Filing year
2020
Status
Order issued setting forth interim operations plan.
Docket number
1:20-cv-00426
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the Eastern District of California (E.D. Cal.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US)NEPA (US)
Principal law
United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)United StatesEndangered Species Act (ESA)United StatesNational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Challenge to biological opinions for long-term operations of two major water diversion projects in California.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
03/14/2022
Order issued setting forth interim operations plan.
Decision
03/11/2022
Federal defendants' motion for remand without vacatur granted.
The federal district court for the Eastern District of California granted federal defendants’ motion for voluntary remand without vacatur in two cases challenging biological opinions issued regarding two major water diversion projects in California, the Central Valley and State Water Projects. The court also imposed an interim operations plan through the end of the 2022 water year in September 2022 while the federal defendants conduct a re-initiated consultation process. The court denied the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations’ request for alternative injunctive relief that would impose a different set of interim measures. The cases—which are stayed through the end of September 2022—involve alleged violations of the Endangered Species Act and National Environmental Policy Act, including allegations that the analysis supporting the conclusions that the projects were not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of threatened and endangered fish species or to destroy or adversely modify their critical habitat did not adequately consider climate change impacts.
Decision
05/11/2020
Motions for preliminary injunction granted in part and denied in part.
Decision

Summary

Challenge to biological opinions for long-term operations of two major water diversion projects in California.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance