- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- Center for Biological Diversity v. California Department of Transportation
Center for Biological Diversity v. California Department of Transportation
Geography
Year
2024
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2024
Status
Petitions for writ of mandate denied.
Geography
Docket number
24CV077619
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Challenge to the environmental review for a highway widening project through a 20.8-mile-long corridor in three California counties.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
08/13/2025
Petitions for writ of mandate denied.
A California trial court dismissed environmental organizations’ California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) lawsuits challenging the California Department of Transportation’s environmental review of the Yolo 80 Corridor Improvements Project. The project adds a lane of traffic to segments of Interstate 80 and U.S. Route 50. The court rejected all of the petitioners’ arguments, including that the CEQA review was improperly “piecemealed,” that the project was inconsistent with the regional transportation plan, and that the CEQA review overestimated the project’s benefits such as congestion relief and underestimated impacts such as greenhouse gas emissions.
Decision
–
04/17/2025
Reply memorandum of points and authorities filed by petitioners.
Reply
–
03/28/2025
Opposition brief filed by respondent California Department of Transportation.
Brief
–
01/14/2025
Opening memorandum of points and authorities filed by petitioners.
Brief
–
05/29/2024
Petition for writ of mandate filed.
Three organizations filed a lawsuit in California Superior Court challenging the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review for the Yolo 80 Corridor Improvement Projects, which would widen Interstate 80 and United States Route 50 through a 20,8-mile-long corridor in Solano, Yolo, and Sacramento counties. The organizations alleged that the California Department of Transportation failed to adequately analyze, disclose, and mitigate the impacts of the project, which they alleged would “impede the state’s climate objectives, worsen air pollution in vulnerable communities, and degrade valuable habitats.”
Petition
–
Summary
Challenge to the environmental review for a highway widening project through a 20.8-mile-long corridor in three California counties.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance