Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Center for Biological Diversity v. California Geological Energy Management Division

About this case

Filing year
2021
Status
CalGEM and industry group motions for judgment on the pleadings denied.
Docket number
RG21090952
Court/admin entity
United StatesState CourtsCalifornia Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US)State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United StatesCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Lawsuit asserting that the Geologic Energy Management Division of the California Department of Conservation issued permits for oil and gas drilling and other oil and gas activities without complying with the California Environmental Quality Act.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
12/22/2021
CalGEM and industry group motions for judgment on the pleadings denied.
A California Superior Court denied motions by the California Geological Energy Management Division (CalGEM) and the oil and gas industry groups for judgment on the pleadings in a case brought by Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) alleging that CalGEM engaged in a pattern and practice of approving oil and gas permits without reviewing their impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The court said CBD could pursue relief in an action for declaratory relief, that the complaint adequately alleged that CalGEM “has a consistent pattern or practice that might be unlawful,” and that the complaint would not circumvent CEQA requirements.
Decision
02/24/2021
Complaint filed.
Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) filed a lawsuit in California Superior Court alleging that the Geologic Energy Management Division of the California Department of Conservation (CalGEM) issued permits for oil and gas drilling and other oil and gas activities without complying with the California Environmental Quality Act. CBD contended that CalGEM engaged in an “unlawful pattern practice” of approving such activities by issuing permits and approvals without any environmental review, in reliance on inapplicable exemptions, or based on inadequate environmental reviews conducted by local governments. CBD alleged that the “continual addition of new oil and gas activity” resulted in significant and well-documented environmental impacts, including significant amounts of greenhouse gas emissions associated with extraction, refining, combustion, and transportation.
Complaint

Summary

Lawsuit asserting that the Geologic Energy Management Division of the California Department of Conservation issued permits for oil and gas drilling and other oil and gas activities without complying with the California Environmental Quality Act.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance