Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Center for Biological Diversity v. Carey

Geography
Year
2024
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2024
Status
Judgment entered in favor of defendants.
Docket number
9:24-cv-00168
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the District of Montana (D. Mont.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)NEPA (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US)Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)United StatesFederal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA)United StatesNational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Challenge to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s authorization of a logging project in the Clark Fork River sub-basin and Garnet Mountain Range.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
04/09/2026
Judgment entered in favor of defendants.
The federal district court for the District of Montana upheld federal defendants’ authorizations for the Clark Fork Face Forest Health and Fuels Reduction Project in the Clark Fork River sub-basin and Garnet Mountain Range east of Missoula, Montana. The court found that the defendants complied with the Endangered Species Act in the consideration of potential effects on grizzly bears, Canada lynx, and bull trout; that the consideration of impacts to Canada lynx was sufficient under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA); that the defendants properly considered the project’s consistency with big game standards in the Missoula Resource Management Plan; and that the defendants conducted an adequate analysis of cumulative impacts with respect to other projects. The plaintiffs’ complaint included a NEPA claim that the defendants failed to consider the climate impacts of the removal of trees, but the plaintiffs did not address this issue in their summary judgment briefing, and the court deemed the claim abandoned.
Decision
06/13/2025
Reply filed by defendants in support of their cross-motion for summary judgment.
Reply
05/30/2025
Reply filed in support of plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
Reply
05/09/2025
Defendants filed memorandum in response to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and in support of defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment.
Motion For Summary Judgment
04/10/2025
Brief filed in support of plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
Motion For Summary Judgment
12/03/2024
Complaint filed.
Center for Biological Diversity and four other conservation organizations filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Montana challenging the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) authorization of a project in the Clark Fork River sub-basin and Garnet Mountain Range that would include logging on 8,283 acres, burning on 4,600 acres, and fuels management treatments on 2,146 acres. The complaint asserted violations of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Administrative Procedure Act, and Federal Land Policy and Management Act. The complaint’s NEPA claims included that BLM failed to take a hard look at the climate impacts of the removal of trees.
Complaint

Summary

Challenge to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s authorization of a logging project in the Clark Fork River sub-basin and Garnet Mountain Range.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance