- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Maryland
- /
- Center for Biological Diversity v. National Marine Fisheries Service
Center for Biological Diversity v. National Marine Fisheries Service
Geography
Year
2025
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2025
Status
Parties filed joint motion to enter settlement.
Geography
Docket number
8:25-cv-00661
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Maryland (D. Md.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)
Principal law
United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)
At issue
Endangered Species Act lawsuit to compel a 12-month finding on a petition to list the smalltail shark.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
01/30/2026
Parties filed joint motion to enter settlement.
Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) agreed to a settlement resolving a lawsuit to compel NMFS to make a 12-month finding on whether listing of the smalltail shark as endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act is warranted. CBD filed the lawsuit—in which CBD alleged that the species is threatened by climate change, overfishing, and other factors— in February 2025, more than two years after it submitted a listing petition and almost two years after NMFS issued a 90-day finding that listing “may be warranted.” In the settlement agreement, NMFS agreed to submit to the Office of the Federal Register by August 12, 2026 a 12-month finding as to whether listing is not warranted, warranted, or warranted but precluded by other pending proposals.
Motion
–
01/30/2026
Complaint dismissed pursuant to stipulated settlement agreement.
Decision
–
02/27/2025
Complaint filed.
Center for Biological Diversity filed a suit in the federal district court for the District of Maryland asserting that the National Marine Fisheries Service violated the Endangered Species Act by failing to issue a timely 12-month listing determination on the organization’s petition to list the smalltail shark. The complaint alleged that the smalltail shark—which is “found in estuaries and nearshore waters of the western Atlantic Ocean from Brazil to the Northern Gulf of Mexico”—had experienced an 80% population decline in the past three decades and that “its continued survival is threatened by climate change, overfishing, habitat degradation, and contamination exposure.”
Complaint
–
Summary
Endangered Species Act lawsuit to compel a 12-month finding on a petition to list the smalltail shark.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Finance