Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Center for Biological Diversity v. Tennessee Valley Authority

About this case

Filing year
2021
Status
Motion to dismiss granted and plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment denied.
Docket number
3:21-cv-00319
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee (E.D. Tenn.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)
At issue
Challenge to Tennessee Valley Authority’s (TVA's) response to a petition requesting that TVA adopt regulations limiting its ability to pay funds to third-party organizations that the plaintiffs alleged worked against the interests of TVA ratepayers.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
09/12/2022
Motion to dismiss granted and plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment denied.
A federal district court in Tennessee dismissed a lawsuit brought by Center for Biological Diversity and other organizations to compel the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) to respond to a petition requesting that TVA curtail financial support for third-party organizations that engage in lobbying and other advocacy in opposition to environmental protections. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish either organizational or associational standing.
Decision
09/09/2021
Complaint filed.
Center for Biological Diversity and five other organizations filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the Eastern District of Tennessee challenging the Tennessee Valley Authority’s (TVA’s) response to their petition requesting that TVA adopt regulations limiting its ability to pay funds to third-party organizations such as trade associations and industry groups that the plaintiffs allege work against the interests of TVA ratepayers. The plaintiffs alleged that TVA had paid certain “Utility Regulatory Groups” millions of dollars for advocacy work and that the groups’ actions included opposition to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions as well as opposition to specific greenhouse gas emission regulations. The plaintiffs asserted that TVA’s response to their petition violated the Administrative Procedure Act because it failed to “meaningfully respond” to the petition and because its delay in resolving the matters raised by the petition amounted to action unreasonably delayed or withheld.
Complaint

Summary

Challenge to Tennessee Valley Authority’s (TVA's) response to a petition requesting that TVA adopt regulations limiting its ability to pay funds to third-party organizations that the plaintiffs alleged worked against the interests of TVA ratepayers.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance