- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Guam
- /
- Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Department of the Navy
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Department of the Navy
Geography
Year
2023
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2023
Status
Defendants' motion to limit judicial review to the administrative record denied.
Geography
Docket number
1:23-cv-00019
Court/admin entity
United States → District Court of Guam (D. Guam)United States → United States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Freedom of Information Act (US) → Lawsuits Brought by Plaintiffs Aligned with Environmentalist Interests (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)United States → Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
At issue
Challenge to the U.S. Department of the Navy’s project to relocate 5,000 marines and their dependents from Okinawa, Japan to Guam.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
12/12/2025
Defendants' motion to limit judicial review to the administrative record denied.
Decision
–
12/14/2024
First amended complaint filed.
Complaint
–
07/18/2023
Complaint filed.
Center for Biological Diversity and a Guam-based nonprofit organization with a mission to protect natural and cultural resources filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Guam challenging the U.S. Department of the Navy’s (Navy’s) project to relocate 5,000 marines and their dependents from Okinawa, Japan to Guam. The plaintiffs asserted that the Navy and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service violated the Endangered Species Act and Administrative Procedure Act by failing to take required steps to protect 15 species listed as endangered or threatened. The plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that the Navy was obligated to reinitiate formal consultation under the Endangered Species Act both because there had been a delay in implementing agreed-upon conservation measures and also because of new information regarding new or increased threats, including an expected 100% increase in intense storms due to climate change that would threaten limestone forests that serve as habitat for listed species. CBD also asserted a claim under the Freedom of Information Act.
Complaint
–
Summary
Challenge to the U.S. Department of the Navy’s project to relocate 5,000 marines and their dependents from Okinawa, Japan to Guam.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Finance