Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

About this case

Filing year
2025
Status
Complaint filed.
Docket number
3:25-cv-01158
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District of Oregon (D. Or.)
Case category
Federal Statutory ClaimsEndangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes
Principal law
United StatesEndangered Species Act (ESA)
At issue
Lawsuit to compel a finding on whether listing of the Crater Lake newt under the Endangered Species Act is warranted, not warranted, or warranted but precluded by other proposals.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
07/03/2025
Complaint filed.
Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) filed a complaint in the federal district court for the District of Oregon to compel the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to issue a 12-month finding on whether listing of the Crater Lake newt under the Endangered Species Act is warranted, not warranted, or warranted but precluded by other proposals. CBD submitted a petition requesting the listing of the Crater Lake newt on an emergency basis on November 28, 2023, and FWS found that listing might be warranted in October 2024. The primary threat cited in the complaint and in the October 2024 finding was predation by introduced species. CBD alleging that the newt was “rapidly headed towards extinction” as invasive crayfish expanded into its habitat. CBD and FWS also cited threats from habitat and food web alteration by signal crayfish (an introduced species), climate change, reduced population size, and range restriction.
Complaint

Summary

Lawsuit to compel a finding on whether listing of the Crater Lake newt under the Endangered Species Act is warranted, not warranted, or warranted but precluded by other proposals.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Impacted group
Economic sector