- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Geography
Year
2022
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2022
Status
Parties entered into a stipulated settlement agreement.
Geography
Docket number
1:22-cv-00246
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.D.C.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)
At issue
Lawsuit to compel the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to propose a rule to revise the Florida manatee’s critical habitat.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
06/01/2022
Parties entered into a stipulated settlement agreement.
Three conservation groups and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) reached an agreement under which the FWS will submit a proposal for revision of critical habitat for the Florida manatee for publication in the Federal Register by September 12, 2024. The conservation groups filed their lawsuit to compel revision of critical habitat in February 2022, alleging that the manatee faces “dire and imminent threats” that are compounded by climate change.
Settlement Agreement
–
02/01/2022
Complaint filed.
Three conservation groups filed a lawsuit asking the federal district court for the District of Columbia to order the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to propose a rule to revise the Florida manatee’s critical habitat. The plaintiffs claimed that the FWS’s ongoing failure to respond to their 2008 petition requesting revision of critical habitat (to respond to changes in the meaning of critical habitat over the previous three decades) constituted action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act and that a 2010 finding that revision of critical habitat was warranted but precluded violated the Endangered Species Act. The plaintiffs alleged that Florida manatees and their habitat continued to face “dire and imminent threats, including the loss of warm-water refuges and poor water quality that causes persistent harmful algal blooms and a profound loss of seagrass, a crucial food source, leading to mass starvation.” The plaintiffs alleged these threats were compounded by boat strikes and climate disruption. The complaint’s allegations also included that climate change is expected to cause an increase in the number and severity of cold-water events that that lead to death for manatees.
Complaint
–
Summary
Lawsuit to compel the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to propose a rule to revise the Florida manatee’s critical habitat.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk
Impacted group
Economic sector
Finance