Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Ikkurty

About this case

Filing year
2022
Status
Final judgment entered in favor of CFTC.
Docket number
1:22-cv-02465
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.)
Case category
Carbon Offsets and Credits (US)Regulatory (US)Securities and Financial Regulation (US)
Principal law
United StatesCommodity Exchange Act
At issue
Action asserting civil violations of the Commodity Exchange Act by defendants who operated "crypto hedge funds" whose investments products included "carbon offset bonds."
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
07/22/2024
Final judgment entered in favor of CFTC.
Decision
07/01/2024
CFTC's motion for summary judgment granted with respect to Counts I, II, and III and defendants' motion for summary judgment and motion to dismiss is denied.
The federal district court for the Northern District of Illinois found that defendants who operated “crypto hedge funds” whose investment products included “carbon offset bonds” (COBs) committed civil violations of the Commodity Exchange Act. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which brought the suit, described the COBs as promissory notes advertised as offering a collateral (Base Carbon Tons tokens) as security. The court found that the defendants defrauded investors by making material misrepresentations of fact. With respect to the COBs, the court found, for instance, that the defendants failed to inform COB purchasers that the same digital wallet holding the collateral was pledged as collateral to dozens of purchasers. The court also found that the CFTC established that the defendants misappropriated funds through the carbon offset program in a “classic Ponzi scheme” in which the defendants bought out investors in a collapsed fund at a pre-crash price, leaving the defendants with insufficient funds to pay COB participants what they were owed. The court also found that the defendants failed to register as a commodity pool operator (CPO) and committed CPO fraud. The court ordered restitution in the amount of customer losses (more than $85 million) and ordered disgorgement of collected commissions (almost $37 million).
Decision
10/16/2023
Motion For Summary Judgment
10/16/2023
Plaintiff filed statement of facts in support of its motion for summary judgment.
Statement
05/10/2022
Complaint filed for injunctive relief, civil monetary penalties and other equitable relief.
Complaint

Summary

Action asserting civil violations of the Commodity Exchange Act by defendants who operated "crypto hedge funds" whose investments products included "carbon offset bonds."

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Finance