- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Argentina
- /
- Comunidad aborigen de Santuario de Tres Pozos et al v. Jujuy Province
Comunidad aborigen de Santuario de Tres Pozos et al v. Jujuy Province
About this case
Filing year
2023
Status
Pending
Geography
Court/admin entity
Argentina
Case category
Suits against governments (Global) → Protecting biodiversity and ecosystems (Global)
Principal law
Argentina → Argentina's Nationally Determined Contribution 2021Argentina → Constitution of Argentina
At issue
Whether a provincial constitution is unconstitutional due to climate, indigenous and environmental concerns.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
07/12/2023
Petition
–
Summary
On July 12, 2023, several Indigenous Communities and an ENGO (Fundación Ambiente y Recursos Naturales – FARN) filed a claim before the Superior Tribunal of Justice of the Jujuy Province challenging the constitutionality of the new provincial constitution. The claim involved several arguments, some of them are environmental and one is climatic. Among others, the plaintiffs alleged the breach of the right of the Indigenous Communities to free, prior and informed consent, the right to access information, the right of human rights defenders in environmental matters, the non-regression principle as contained in the Escazú Agreement and the infringement of international and national environmental provisions.
Regarding this last argument and particularly climate concerns, the plaintiffs observed that Jujuy is home to (high-Andean) wetlands (salt pans, salt flats, lagoons, meadows) that provide a range of key environmental benefits, such as climate mitigation and adaptation, and that those ecosystems are threatened by the impacts of climate change and human activities with high impact, including the increasing lithium mining. In this context, the plaintiffs argued, there is a need to develop a sound protection of these ecosystems that includes an intergenerational approach and the rights of the future generation. This protection is, however, according to the plaintiffs, disregarded by the new constitutional text that regulates these ecosystems mainly as objects of exploitation and production. In this sense, the new constitutional text would not engage with the National Climate Change Act, nor with the NDC or the National Long-Term Strategy. Particularly, the provincial constitutional text would breach the principle of priority introduced by the National Climate Change Act and that establishes that adaptation and mitigation policies must prioritize the needs of vulnerable groups in the context of climate change (Art. 4.c Act 27.520).
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance