- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Hawaii
- /
- County of Maui v. Sunoco LP
County of Maui v. Sunoco LP
About this case
Filing year
2020
Status
Motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed by defendants.
Geography
Docket number
2CCV-20-0000283
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → Hawaii Circuit Court (Haw. Cir. Ct.)
Case category
Adaptation (US) → Actions seeking money damages for losses (US)Common Law Claims (US)
Principal law
United States → State Law–Strict LiabilityUnited States → State Law—NegligenceUnited States → State Law—NuisanceUnited States → State Law—Trespass
At issue
Lawsuit seeking damages and other relief from fossil fuel companies for climate change impacts allegedly caused by companies' conduct.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
06/24/2022
Motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed by defendants.
Motion To Dismiss
–
06/24/2022
Plaintiff filed opposition to joint motion to dismiss.
Opposition
–
05/25/2022
Joint motion to dismiss filed by defendants.
Motion To Dismiss
–
10/12/2020
Complaint filed.
On October 12, 20201, the County of Maui filed a lawsuit in Hawai‘i Circuit Court against fossil fuel companies seeking to hold them liable for climate change impacts. In its complaint, Maui alleged that the defendant companies were “directly responsible for the substantial increase in all CO2 emissions between 1965 and the present” and that but for the defendants’ participation in “denialist campaigns” to mislead the public about the role of their products in causing climate change, the impacts of climate change “would have been substantially mitigated or eliminated altogether.” The adverse climate change impacts alleged to affect Maui include sea level rise and related flooding, inundation, erosion, and beach lose; extreme weather; ocean warming and acidification; increasingly scarce freshwater supplies; loss of habitat for endemic species; and social and economic consequences of these environmental changes. Maui asserted causes of action for public nuisance, private nuisance, strict liability failure to warn, negligent failure to warn, and trespass. The complaint asked the court for compensatory damages, equitable relief, attorneys’ fees, punitive damages, disgorgement of profits, and costs of suit.
Complaint
–
Summary
Lawsuit seeking damages and other relief from fossil fuel companies for climate change impacts allegedly caused by companies' conduct.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance