Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

County of Maui v. Sunoco LP

Geography
Year
2020
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2020
Status
Motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed by defendants.
Docket number
2CCV-20-0000283
Court/admin entity
United StatesState CourtsHawaii Circuit Court (Haw. Cir. Ct.)
Case category
Adaptation (US)Actions seeking money damages for losses (US)Common Law Claims (US)
Principal law
United StatesState Law–Strict LiabilityUnited StatesState Law—NegligenceUnited StatesState Law—NuisanceUnited StatesState Law—Trespass
At issue
Lawsuit seeking damages and other relief from fossil fuel companies for climate change impacts allegedly caused by companies' conduct.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
06/24/2022
Motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed by defendants.
Motion To Dismiss
06/24/2022
Plaintiff filed opposition to joint motion to dismiss.
Opposition
05/25/2022
Joint motion to dismiss filed by defendants.
Motion To Dismiss
10/12/2020
Complaint filed.
On October 12, 20201, the County of Maui filed a lawsuit in Hawai‘i Circuit Court against fossil fuel companies seeking to hold them liable for climate change impacts. In its complaint, Maui alleged that the defendant companies were “directly responsible for the substantial increase in all CO2 emissions between 1965 and the present” and that but for the defendants’ participation in “denialist campaigns” to mislead the public about the role of their products in causing climate change, the impacts of climate change “would have been substantially mitigated or eliminated altogether.” The adverse climate change impacts alleged to affect Maui include sea level rise and related flooding, inundation, erosion, and beach lose; extreme weather; ocean warming and acidification; increasingly scarce freshwater supplies; loss of habitat for endemic species; and social and economic consequences of these environmental changes. Maui asserted causes of action for public nuisance, private nuisance, strict liability failure to warn, negligent failure to warn, and trespass. The complaint asked the court for compensatory damages, equitable relief, attorneys’ fees, punitive damages, disgorgement of profits, and costs of suit.
Complaint

Summary

Lawsuit seeking damages and other relief from fossil fuel companies for climate change impacts allegedly caused by companies' conduct.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance