- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- New Mexico
- /
- Diné Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment v. Bernhardt
Diné Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment v. Bernhardt
Geography
Year
2015
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2015
Status
Petition for panel rehearing denied.
Geography
Docket number
18-2089
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (10th Cir.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)
Principal law
United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Challenge to approval of applications for permits to drill in the San Juan Basin.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
06/24/2019
Petition for panel rehearing denied.
Decision
–
06/20/2019
Petition for panel rehearing filed.
Petition For Rehearing
–
05/07/2019
District court's judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part and case remanded to district court with instructions to vacate the findings of no significant impact and drilling approvals and to remand to BLM for proper NEPA analysis.
The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) had violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by failing to consider cumulative water impacts associated with 3,960 reasonably foreseeable horizontal wells in the Mancos Shale in the San Juan Basin in New Mexico. The Tenth Circuit directed that the environmental assessments for those wells be remanded for BLM to conduct proper NEPA analysis. The Tenth Circuit’s decision did not address issues raised in the district court concerning greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, although the Tenth Circuit concluded that BLM was required to consider the cumulative impacts, including air pollution impacts, for all reasonably foreseeable wells, the court concluded that the appellants had not provided a record from which the court could assess BLM’s air analysis. The Tenth Circuit also did not reverse the district court’s conclusions that BLM had not violated the National Historic Preservation Act.
Decision
–
12/03/2018
Reply brief filed by appellants.
Reply
–
11/05/2018
Response brief filed by federal appellees.
Brief
–
11/05/2018
Response brief filed by intervenors.
Brief
–
08/31/2018
Opening brief filed by appellants.
Brief
–
Summary
Challenge to approval of applications for permits to drill in the San Juan Basin.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance