Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Director of Public Prosecutions v. Fraser and O’Donnell

Geography
Year
2008
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2008
Status
Dismissed
Geography
Court/admin entity
Australia → New South Wales → Supreme Court of New South Wales, Common Law Division
Case category
Suits against corporations, individuals (Global) → Protesters (Global)
Principal law
Australia → Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
Topics
, ,  

Documents

Each case in our database can contain one or more documents.

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Search results
05/02/2008
On 24 September 2007, two environmental activists associated with Greenpeace trespassed into a coal loader owned by Port Waratah Coal Services and halted the operation of the conveyor belt for almost two hours at a cost of approximately $27,000. Police arrested and charged the activists for “maliciously damaging property” under section 195 (1) of the Crimes Act 1900. The prosecutor and counsel for the defendants questioned the meaning of “damages” as it appeared in section 195 and whether the defendants’ actions applied. The magistrate ruled that there were two sorts of damages (physical and monetary) and that the defendants could only be charged for monetary damage, which would constitute a civil crime, not a criminal one. He proceeded to dismiss the charge.
Decision
–

Summary

On 24 September 2007, two environmental activists associated with Greenpeace trespassed into a coal loader owned by Port Waratah Coal Services and halted the operation of the conveyor belt for almost two hours at a cost of approximately $27,000. Police arrested and charged the activists for “maliciously damaging property” under section 195 (1) of the Crimes Act 1900. The prosecutor and counsel for the defendants questioned the meaning of “damages” as it appeared in section 195 and whether the defendants’ actions applied. The magistrate ruled that there were two sorts of damages (physical and monetary) and that the defendants could only be charged for monetary damage, which would constitute a civil crime, not a criminal one. He proceeded to dismiss the charge.

 Topics mentioned most in this case

See how often Topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document.

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Finance