- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Minnesota
- /
- East Phillips Neighborhood Institute, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis
East Phillips Neighborhood Institute, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis
Geography
Year
2021
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2021
Status
City's decision affirmed.
Geography
Docket number
A21-1297
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → Minnesota Court of Appeals (Minn. Ct. App.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → Minnesota Environmental Policy Act
At issue
Challenge to the City of Minneapolis' environmental review for the proposed expansion of a water maintenance facility.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
02/06/2023
City's decision affirmed.
The Minnesota Court of Appeals found that the City of Minneapolis’s environmental-assessment worksheet (EAW) for the proposed expansion of a water maintenance facility was complete and accurate in compliance with applicable authorities. Among the arguments rejected by the court was a contention that the EAW did not address the project’s climate change impacts. The court first stated that a 2019 nonprecedential decision did not establish a requirement that EAWs must consider greenhouse gas emissions. The court further found that in this case, Minneapolis included data on current greenhouse gas emissions and projected increases in emissions. In addition, the court noted that the City had indicated in responses to public comments that it would rely on its Climate Action Plan and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s recommended green practices to mitigate the project’s climate change effects.
Decision
–
Summary
Challenge to the City of Minneapolis' environmental review for the proposed expansion of a water maintenance facility.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance