- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- Elfin Forest Harmony Grove Town Council v. County of San Diego
Elfin Forest Harmony Grove Town Council v. County of San Diego
Geography
Year
2018
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2018
Status
Final judgment of trial court affirmed in part and reversed in part and trial court directed to issue a new writ of mandate and judgment.
Geography
Docket number
D077611, D078101
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Court of Appeals (Cal. Ct. App.)
Case category
Carbon Offsets and Credits (US) → Regulatory (US)State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Lawsuit challenging the environmental review for a mixed-use development in San Diego County.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
10/14/2021
Final judgment of trial court affirmed in part and reversed in part and trial court directed to issue a new writ of mandate and judgment.
The California Court of Appeal ruled that greenhouse gas mitigation measures imposed by San Diego County for a 111-acre mixed-use development lacked objective performance criteria to ensure their effectiveness and that they improperly deferred mitigation. The court found that the mitigation measures—which required the project applicant to purchase and retire carbon credits to offset the project’s construction and operations emissions—shared some of the same deficiencies that the Court of Appeals identified in a <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/sierra-club-v-county-of-san-diego-2/">case</a> in which it invalidated mitigation measures provided for in the County’s Climate Action Plan. In particular, the court said the absence of protocols to ensure that carbon offsets were real, permanent, quantifiable, verifiable, and enforceable was a “fatal deficiency.” Because the measures did not provide reasonable assurance that emissions reductions would occur, the court found they were invalid under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Decision
–
Summary
Lawsuit challenging the environmental review for a mixed-use development in San Diego County.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance