- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Utah
- /
- EnerVest, Ltd. v. Jewell
EnerVest, Ltd. v. Jewell
Geography
Year
2016
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2016
Status
Order issued directing BLM either to issue the remaining permits or to provide non-arbitrary reasons supported by substantial evidence as to why it needs more time to process the permits.
Geography
Docket number
2:16-cv-01256
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Utah (D. Utah)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Mineral Leasing Act (MLA)United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Lawsuit to compel the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to grant applications for permits to drill.
Topics
, ,  
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
12/30/2016
Order issued directing BLM either to issue the remaining permits or to provide non-arbitrary reasons supported by substantial evidence as to why it needs more time to process the permits.
Decision
–
12/13/2016
Complaint filed.
In December 2016, an oil and gas producer with federal oil and gas leasehold interests in the Uintah Basin, Utah, filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Utah against the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) seeking to compel BLM to grant 10 applications for permit to drill (APDs) that the company had submitted three months earlier. The plaintiffs alleged that BLM personnel had informed them that the APDs would not be approved because new guidance the Council on Environmental Quality had issued regarding the assessment of impacts on greenhouse gas emissions had rendered analysis in the environmental impact statement and record of decision issued in 2010 inadequate. The plaintiffs alleged that BLM had never specifically identified any new information that would require additional analysis and that BLM had a non-discretionary duty under the Mineral Leasing Act to act on the APDs within a mandatory timeframe.
Complaint
–
Summary
Lawsuit to compel the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to grant applications for permits to drill.
 Topics mentioned most in this case  Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance