- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco
Geography
Year
2017
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2017
Status
Petition for review denied.
Geography
Docket number
S288664
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Supreme Court (Cal.)
Case category
Adaptation (US) → Actions seeking money damages for losses (US)Common Law Claims (US)
Principal law
United States → California Environmental Marketing Claims ActUnited States → California Government CodeUnited States → State Law–Strict LiabilityUnited States → State Law—Miscellaneous Statutes → California False Advertising Law → California Unfair Competition LawUnited States → State Law—NegligenceUnited States → State Law—Nuisance
At issue
California's and local governments' lawsuits against fossil fuel companies alleging that the defendants' concealed and misrepresented the risks of climate change and caused the plaintiffs' climate change injuries.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
02/11/2025
Petition for review denied.
On February 11, 2025, the California Supreme Court denied fossil fuel companies’ petition for review of a California trial court’s determination that it had personal jurisdiction over the defendants in lawsuits brought by the California Attorney General and California localities seeking to hold the companies liable for allegedly participating in a misinformation campaign regarding the harmful climate impacts of their products.
Decision
–
01/02/2025
Petition for review filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation et al.
Fossil fuel companies filed a petition for review in the California Supreme Court requesting that the court review the trial court’s determination that it had personal jurisdiction over the defendants. The defendants argued that the case presented “an important legal question concerning the limits of a court’s specific personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant for a claim allegedly caused in overwhelming part by conduct outside of the forum State.” An intermediate appellate court had denied the defendants’ petition for writ of mandate.
Petition
–
Summary
California's and local governments' lawsuits against fossil fuel companies alleging that the defendants' concealed and misrepresented the risks of climate change and caused the plaintiffs' climate change injuries.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance