- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Friends of Cedar Mesa v. Department of the Interior
Friends of Cedar Mesa v. Department of the Interior
Geography
Year
2021
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2021
Status
Joint motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice filed.
Geography
Docket number
21-cv-971
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.D.C.)
Case category
Adaptation (US) → Reverse Impact Assessment (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)United States → National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)
At issue
Challenge to approval of oil and gas leases in southeastern Utah, including for failure to consider climate change impacts on cultural resources.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
01/25/2023
Parties filed stipulated settlement agreement.
Settlement Agreement
–
01/25/2023
Joint motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice filed.
A Utah-based conservation organization and federal defendants filed a joint motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice of the organization’s lawsuit challenging 32 oil and gas leases. The parties executed a settlement agreement pursuant to which the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will conduct additional analyses under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National Historic Preservation Act, and the Endangered Species Act. The new NEPA analysis will include consideration of a “no leasing” alternative. BLM is to issue a new decision by April 10, 2024 on the 32 leases, all of which were currently suspended.
Motion To Dismiss
–
06/27/2022
State of Utah's motion to intervene granted.
The federal district court for the District of Columbia concluded that the State of Utah could intervene in a case challenging federal approval of 32 oil and gas leases in southeastern Utah. The complaint’s allegations included that federal defendants failed to consider cumulative impacts of climate change on cultural resources. The court found that Utah met all four elements for intervention as of right because the State sought to intervene prior to deadline for serving the administrative record, the State had legally protected economic and regulatory interests that were at stake, and the federal defendants’ representation of those interests might be inadequate.
Decision
–
12/15/2021
Motion to intervene filed by State of Utah.
Motion To Intervene
–
04/08/2021
Complaint filed.
A conservation nonprofit organization filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Columbia alleging that federal defendants’ approval of oil and gas leases in southeastern Utah failed to comply with the National Historic Preservation Act, NEPA, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the Endangered Species Act. The organization’s NEPA allegations included that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management “utterly ignored the cumulative impacts of climate change on cultural resource degradation,” citing public comments, including by the plaintiff, that “climate change trends will impact both exposed and buried cultural resources by increasing erosion, flooding, dust deposition, wildfire, and thermal stress—all of which are known to deteriorate cultural resources.” The complaint alleged that BLM failed to acknowledge or study these impacts in either a March 2018 environmental assessment (EA) or a 2021 supplemental EA prepared in response to a July 2019 court decision finding that BLM did not adequately consider greenhouse gas impacts in its review of oil and gas leases in Wyoming.
Complaint
–
Summary
Challenge to approval of oil and gas leases in southeastern Utah, including for failure to consider climate change impacts on cultural resources.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance