- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Friends of the Earth v. Haaland
Friends of the Earth v. Haaland
Geography
Year
2021
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2021
Status
District court’s January 27, 2022 order vacated and case remanded with directions to dismiss as moot.
Geography
Docket number
22-5036, 22-5037, 22-5067
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Lawsuit challenging federal defendants' decision to hold an offshore oil and gas lease sale in the Gulf of Mexico.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
04/28/2023
District court’s January 27, 2022 order vacated and case remanded with directions to dismiss as moot.
In an unpublished judgment, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals held that a case challenging Lease Sale 257 for the development of oil and gas resources in the Gulf of Mexico was moot because the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) included instructions for the Secretary of the Interior to issue leases to the high bidders. A district court had vacated the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s record of decision in January 2022 for failure to comply with NEPA. Because the legislative act mooted the case, the D.C. Circuit vacated the January 2022 district court order and remanded with instructions to dismiss. The D.C. Circuit rejected environmental groups’ arguments that a live controversy remained. The court concluded that the IRA did not condition issuance of the leases on the outcome of the appeal of the January 2022 order; that the IRA made clear that issuance of the leases was nondiscretionary and no longer subject to NEPA; and that the IRA did not intrude on the judiciary’s independence.
Decision
–
01/24/2023
Amicus brief filed by states in support of appellees Friends of the Earth et al. and affirmance.
Amicus Motion/Brief
–
01/11/2023
Reply brief filed by appellants American Petroleum Institute and State of Louisiana.
Reply
–
08/17/2022
Letter filed by the Department of Justice regarding enactment of the Inflation Reduction Act.
Letter
–
06/13/2022
Brief filed by amicus curiae BP Exploration & Production Inc. supporting intervenors-defendants-appellants.
Amicus Motion/Brief
–
06/13/2022
Brief filed by Chevron U.S.A. Inc. as amicus curiae in support of intervenor-appellant and reversal.
Amicus Motion/Brief
–
06/13/2022
Amici curiae brief filed by EnerGeo Alliance and National Ocean Industries Association.
Amicus Motion/Brief
–
06/13/2022
Brief filed by amicus curiae Shell Offshore Inc. in support of defendant intervenors-appellants.
Amicus Motion/Brief
–
06/13/2022
Brief filed by Montana and 13 other states as amici curiae in support of appellants.
Amicus Motion/Brief
–
06/13/2022
Brief filed by amicus curiae Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America in support of appellants and reversal.
Amicus Motion/Brief
–
06/10/2022
EnerGeo Alliance and National Ocean Industries Association filed notice of intent to to file amici curiae brief in support of defendant intervenors-appellants.
Notice
–
06/10/2022
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed notice of intent to file amicus curiae brief in support of appellants and reversal.
Notice
–
03/08/2022
Emergency motion to expedite denied and motion to dismiss referred to the merits panel.
The D.C. Circuit denied American Petroleum Institute's emergency motion to expedite the appeal because all parties agreed that the U.S. Department of the Interior could still award leases pursuant to the lease sale if the D.C. Circuit reversed the district court’s vacatur of the lease sale. The court also referred to the merits panel a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction by Friends of the Earth and the other appellees.
Decision
–
03/01/2022
Reply filed by plaintiffs-appellees in support of motion to dismiss.
Reply
–
02/28/2022
Response to plaintiffs-appellees' motion to dismiss filed by federal defendant-appellees.
Response
–
02/22/2022
American Petroleum Institute filed reply in support of motion to expedite and opposition to plaintiff's cross-motion to dismiss.
Reply
–
02/18/2022
Appellees filed combined response to intervenor-appellant's emergency motion to expedite and cross-motion to dismiss.
Motion
–
02/11/2022
Emergency motion to expedite filed by American Petroleum Institute.
Motion
–
Summary
Lawsuit challenging federal defendants' decision to hold an offshore oil and gas lease sale in the Gulf of Mexico.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance