Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Friends of the Santa Clara River v. County of Los Angeles

About this case

Filing year
2017
Status
Petition for writ of mandate denied.
Docket number
BS170568
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
Adaptation (US) → Reverse Impact Assessment (US)Carbon Offsets and Credits (US) → Regulatory (US)State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Topics
, ,  

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
12/19/2018
Friends of the Santa Clara River v. County of Los Angeles - decision
Petition for writ of mandate denied.
The California Superior Court rejected California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) claims challenging the sufficiency of mitigation measures adopted by the developers of the Newhall Ranch project in response to litigation in which the California Supreme Court found that the California Department of Fish and Wildlife had not supported its determination that greenhouse gas emissions from the project would be less than significant. The Superior Court found that substantial evidence supported the CEQA determination that the two villages of the Newhall Ranch development that were the subject of this litigation would generate zero net energy with implementation of the mitigation measures. The court also found that the 30-year timeframe and baseline used for evaluating the projects' greenhouse gas emissions was appropriate, that CEQA did not require mitigation to "less than significance." In addition, the court rejected the petitioners' contention that new information about climate change's impacts on water supply required preparation of a supplemental environmental impact report.
Decision
–
06/26/2018
Joint opposition brief filed by respondents and real party in interest.
Brief
–

Summary

Challenge to Los Angeles County's determination that mitigation measures adopted by Newhall Ranch developer had reduced the greenhouse gas impacts of two "villages" within the project to less than significance.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance