- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States of America
- /
- Montana
- /
- Giacometto Ranch Inc. v. Denbury Onshore LLC
Giacometto Ranch Inc. v. Denbury Onshore LLC
Geography
Year
2016
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2016
Status
Court ordered judgment as a matter of law for defendants.
Geography
Docket number
1:16-cv-00145-SPW
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Montana (D. Mont.)
Case category
Carbon Offsets and Credits (US) → Commercial (US)
Principal law
United States → Contract LawUnited States → State Law—Miscellaneous Statutes → Montana Code Annotated 28-2-701 → Montana Surface Owner Damage and Disruption Compensation Act
At issue
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
11/02/2022
Court ordered judgment as a matter of law for defendants.
The court adopted the magistrate's findings and recommendations and granted the defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law.
Decision
–
07/15/2020
Magistrate recommended that the defendants' motion for judgment of a matter of law be granted.
A magistrate judge recommended that the defendants' motion for judgment of a matter of law be granted. Plaintiffs had not provided sufficient evidence to show that the defendants were permanently sequestering carbon dioxide in the plaintiff’s pore space. Further, the plaintiffs made an unjust enrichment claim based on the defendants allegedly profiting from carbon credits. The court, however, decided that the plaintiffs had not provided sufficient evidence to prove that the defendants were indeed utilizing carbon credits.
Report And Recommendation
–
11/24/2016
Complaint filed.
The plaintiffs, owners of a large cattle and farming ranch, leased the oil and mineral rights to the defendants, an oil and natural gas company. The parties agreed that the pore space belonged to the plaintiffs. The defendants injected carbon dioxide underground as part of enhanced oil recovery efforts. The plaintiffs claimed that the permanent sequestration of carbon dioxide constituted trespass into their pore space.
Complaint
–
Summary
Lawsuit claiming that the permanent sequestration of carbon dioxide constituted trespass into plaintiffs' pore space, and that the defendants unjustly enriched themselves by selling carbon credits.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance