- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Luxembourg
- /
- Greenpeace Luxembourg v. Schneider
Greenpeace Luxembourg v. Schneider
About this case
Filing year
2019
Status
Decided
Geography
Court/admin entity
Luxembourg → Administrative Court
Case category
Suits against governments (Global) → Access to information (Global)
Principal law
–
At issue
Claimant sought information on Luxembourg's national pension fund's investment in climate-harming industries.
Topics
, ,  
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
03/12/2020
Letter from sovereign pension fund (in German)
Other
–
Summary
In September 2019, Greenpeace Luxembourg brought an action in administrative court against the Luxembourgish Minister of Social Security, Roman Schneider. Greenpeace claims that the Minister failed to respond to an August letter asking for information regarding how Luxembourg's sovereign pension fund planned to align its investments with the objectives of the Paris Agreement, and information on the climate-related financial risks associated with the fund's investments.
According to Greenpeace, in December 2019 an administrative judge ruled that the claim was admissible because Minister Schneider failed to comply with his legal obligation to respond to the letter, and the information sought was covered by the Law on Access to Environmental Information. However, the judge found no legal basis for requiring the Minister to comply with the Paris Agreement or to have the climate-related information that Greenpeace requested. Greenpeace reports that in March 2020, the president of the sovereign pension fund promised in a letter addressed to Greenpeace Luxembourg that the fund will deliver a sustainability report in the third quarter of 2020, including a detailed analysis of the carbon footprint and the climate-related financial risks of the fund's investments.
 Topics mentioned most in this case  Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance