- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Arkansas
- /
- Hempstead County Hunting Club, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service Commission
Hempstead County Hunting Club, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service Commission
Geography
Year
2008
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2008
Status
Opinion issued reversing the grant of the CECPN application.
Geography
Docket number
CA 08-128
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → Arkansas Court of Appeals (Ark. Ct. App.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → Utility Regulation (US)
Principal law
United States → Arkansas Utility Facility and Economic Protection Act
At issue
Appeal of Arkansas Public Service Commission's grant of a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need for construction, maintenance, and operation of an ultra-supercritical coal-fired baseload electric generation facility.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
06/24/2009
Opinion issued reversing the grant of the CECPN application.
An Arkansas appellate court struck down a state authorization allowing an electric company to build a $1.6 billion coal-fired power plant near the state’s southwest border with Texas. The court held that the Arkansas Public Service Commission failed to require the company to address alternative locations in its permit application and that it failed to make a finding regarding the basis of the need for a new plant. In addition, the court held that the Commission failed to resolve all matters concerning the plant and associated transmission lines in a single proceeding.
Decision
–
Summary
Appeal of Arkansas Public Service Commission's grant of a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need for construction, maintenance, and operation of an ultra-supercritical coal-fired baseload electric generation facility.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance