Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

IBAMA vs. Minerva Ribeiro de Barros e Genesisagro S/A

Geography
Date
2018
Document type
Litigation

About this cases

Filing year
2023
Status
Pending
Court/admin entity
BrazilMaranhãoMaranhão Federal Court
Case category
Suits against corporations, individualsCorporationsClimate damage
Principal law
BrazilFederal Constitution of 1988BrazilForest Code (Law No. 12.651 of 2012)BrazilNational Environmental Policy Act (Law No. 6.938 of 1981)
At issue
Restoration for environmental and climate damage caused by deforestation in the Cerrado.

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Search results
09/11/2018
Initial Petition from IBAMA (in Portuguese)
Petition

Summary

On September 11, 2023, Brazil’s Federal Environment Agency (“IBAMA”), filed a public civil action (environmental class-action) against Minerva Ribeiro de Barros e Genesisagro S/A. seeking compensation for environmental and climate damages. The plaintiff claims that 190,960 ha (hectares) of native Cerrado forest were cleared at the Pedra Chata Piranhas farm without prior authorization from the competent environmental agency. It highlights the great importance of the Cerrado and that the advance of illegal deforestation of the biome contributes to the climate crisis. According to remote sensing images, the plaintiff claims that the area continues to be exploited (even though it has been embargoed by IBAMA), without regeneration measures having been adopted. It argues that the defendants are civilly liable for the specific environmental damage caused by the irregular suppression of native forest in the Cerrado and the existence of resulting environmental damage that includes damage to fauna, soil, climate and biodiversity, among other harmful consequences related to deforestation. Several measures to secure the prohibition of further exploitation of the deforested area are requested as an injunction. In a definitive manner, it is requested that the defendants be ordered to (i) recover an area corresponding to the deforested one, (ii) pay collective moral damages in the amount of R$1,442,320.88, (iii) pay for the transitory and residual damage caused to ecological heritage, in addition to compensation for the economic profit obtained illegally, including climate damage.