- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Independent Petroleum Association of America v. EPA
Independent Petroleum Association of America v. EPA
Geography
Year
2025
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2025
Status
Cases held in abeyance pending further order of the court.
Geography
Docket number
25-1021
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)United States → United States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Clean Air Act (US) → Industry Lawsuits (US) → Other Regulation (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Clean Air Act (CAA)United States → Inflation Reduction Act of 2022
At issue
Challenges to EPA's final rule implementing the Inflation Reduction Act's waste emissions charge.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
02/28/2025
Cases held in abeyance pending further order of the court.
The D.C. Circuit granted EPA’s unopposed motion to hold cases challenging the Inflation Reduction Act waste emissions charge rule in abeyance.
Decision
–
02/14/2025
Motion filed by Environmental Law & Policy Center to intervene in support of respondents.
Motion To Intervene
–
02/12/2025
Motion filed by respondents to hold case in abeyance.
Motion
–
01/31/2025
Motion to intervene in support of respondents filed by environmental and public health organizations.
Motion To Intervene
–
01/15/2025
Petition for review filed.
Six petitions for review were filed in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals challenging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) final rule on “Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions.” The rule implements the waste emissions charge in the Inflation Reduction Act’s (IRA’s) Methane Emission Reduction Program. Petitioners included trade associations of oil and natural gas producers; Texas and 22 other states; and other industry and business groups. Petitioners said they would show that the final rule exceeded EPA’s statutory authority and was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and not in accordance with law.
Petition
–
Summary
Challenges to EPA's final rule implementing the Inflation Reduction Act's waste emissions charge.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance