Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Indiana Community Action Association Inc. v. United States

About this case

Filing year
2026
Status
Complaint filed.
Docket number
1:26-cv-01376
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States Court of Federal Claims (Fed. Cl.)
Case category
Constitutional Claims (US) → Other Constitutional Claims (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Breach of Covenant of Good Faith and Fair DealingUnited States → Clean Air Act (CAA)United States → Contract LawUnited States → Fifth Amendment—Due ProcessUnited States → Fifth Amendment—TakingsUnited States → Inflation Reduction Act of 2022United States → One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)United States → Tucker Act
At issue
Document with title of Indiana Community Action Association Inc. v. United States
Topics
, ,  

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
09/17/2026
Complaint filed.
Indiana Community Action Association Inc.—“a statewide not-for-profit membership corporation serving all of Indiana’s 92 counties” that has “an organizational mission to help the state’s 22 Community Action Agencies … address conditions of poverty”—filed suit in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims asserting that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) breached a grant agreement under the Solar for All program established under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The complaint sought money damages resulting from EPA’s alleged breach of the $117,470,000 agreement. The plaintiff alleged that EPA’s unilateral termination of the grant agreement on August 8, 2025 was “a clear, unambiguous, and material breach” of the agreement. The complaint noted that EPA “purportedly acted based on its misguided understanding” of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which repealed the IRA provision creating the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund under which the Solar for All program was created. The plaintiff alleged that OBBBA only repealed unobligated balances and that, because EPA had fully obligated the plaintiff’s Solar for All funds prior to OBBBA’s enactment, the grant funds were not rescinded. The complaint asserted breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, as well as a claim that removal of monies from the account that held the plaintiff’s grant funds constituted an illegal exaction in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. In the alternative, the plaintiff asserted an unconstitutional taking claim.
Complaint
–

Summary

Breach of contract action against the United States seeking money damages for unilateral termination of Solar for All grant agreement.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance