Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Inside Passage Electric Cooperative v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

Geography
Year
2023
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2023
Status
Complaint filed.
Docket number
3:23-cv-00204
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the District of Alaska (D. Alaska)
Case category
Adaptation (US)Challenges to adaptation measures (US)Constitutional Claims (US)Other Constitutional Claims (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US)Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)United StatesAlaska National Interest Lands Conservation ActUnited StatesAlaska Statehood ActUnited StatesArticle I (U.S. Constitution)United StatesFY 2015 Defense Authorization ActUnited StatesForest Roads and Trails ActUnited StatesForest Service Organic ActUnited StatesMultiple-Use Sustained Yield Act (MUSYA)United StatesSafe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU)United StatesSeparation of Powers DoctrineUnited StatesTongass Timber Reform ActUnited StatesWilderness Act
At issue
Challenge to the Biden administration's reinstatement of the Roadless Rule in the Tongass National Forest in Alaska.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
09/08/2023
Complaint filed.
An electric utility and an electric utility trade group filed a lawsuit in the federal district court challenging the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) January 2023 decision to reinstate the Roadless Area Conservation Final Rule (Roadless Rule) in the Tongass National Forest. The January 2023 action repealed an October 2020 rule that exempted the Tongass National Forest from the Roadless Rule. In the notice of the repeal of the October 2020 rule, USDA stated that it now believed that the “adverse consequences” of exempting the Tongass from the Roadless Rule outweighed the benefits of decreasing federal regulation. USDA also found that restoring the Roadless Rule would advance or be consistent with other policy priorities, including retaining and enhancing carbon storage and enhancing climate resilience. The notice stated that “[t]he Tongass stores more carbon than any other national forest in the United States. Large old-growth trees in the Tongass are important for carbon storage and sequestration, which can play a role in addressing the climate crisis.” The plaintiffs asserted a claim that the reinstatement was ultra vires under the Administrative Procedure Act (citing the Forest Service Organic Act and the Multiple-Use Sustained Yield Act) and a claim that the action violated separation of powers. The State of Alaska also filed a <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/alaska-v-us-department-of-agriculture/">lawsuit</a> challenging the repeal of the 2020 rule.
Complaint
01/27/2023
Forest Service repealed 2020 rule exempting the Tongass National Forest from the Roadless Rule.
Notice

Summary

Challenge to the Biden administration's reinstatement of the Roadless Rule in the Tongass National Forest in Alaska.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance