- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Alaska
- /
- Inside Passage Electric Cooperative v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
Inside Passage Electric Cooperative v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
Geography
Year
2023
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2023
Status
Complaint filed.
Geography
Docket number
3:23-cv-00204
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Alaska (D. Alaska)
Case category
Adaptation (US) → Challenges to adaptation measures (US)Constitutional Claims (US) → Other Constitutional Claims (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation ActUnited States → Alaska Statehood ActUnited States → Article I (U.S. Constitution)United States → FY 2015 Defense Authorization ActUnited States → Forest Roads and Trails ActUnited States → Forest Service Organic ActUnited States → Multiple-Use Sustained Yield Act (MUSYA)United States → Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU)United States → Separation of Powers DoctrineUnited States → Tongass Timber Reform ActUnited States → Wilderness Act
At issue
Challenge to the Biden administration's reinstatement of the Roadless Rule in the Tongass National Forest in Alaska.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
09/08/2023
Complaint filed.
An electric utility and an electric utility trade group filed a lawsuit in the federal district court challenging the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) January 2023 decision to reinstate the Roadless Area Conservation Final Rule (Roadless Rule) in the Tongass National Forest. The January 2023 action repealed an October 2020 rule that exempted the Tongass National Forest from the Roadless Rule. In the notice of the repeal of the October 2020 rule, USDA stated that it now believed that the “adverse consequences” of exempting the Tongass from the Roadless Rule outweighed the benefits of decreasing federal regulation. USDA also found that restoring the Roadless Rule would advance or be consistent with other policy priorities, including retaining and enhancing carbon storage and enhancing climate resilience. The notice stated that “[t]he Tongass stores more carbon than any other national forest in the United States. Large old-growth trees in the Tongass are important for carbon storage and sequestration, which can play a role in addressing the climate crisis.” The plaintiffs asserted a claim that the reinstatement was ultra vires under the Administrative Procedure Act (citing the Forest Service Organic Act and the Multiple-Use Sustained Yield Act) and a claim that the action violated separation of powers. The State of Alaska also filed a <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/alaska-v-us-department-of-agriculture/">lawsuit</a> challenging the repeal of the 2020 rule.
Complaint
–
01/27/2023
Forest Service repealed 2020 rule exempting the Tongass National Forest from the Roadless Rule.
Notice
–
Summary
Challenge to the Biden administration's reinstatement of the Roadless Rule in the Tongass National Forest in Alaska.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance