- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Missouri
- /
- Iowa v. James
Iowa v. James
About this case
Filing year
2026
Status
Complaint filed.
Geography
Docket number
4:26-cv-00752
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the Eastern District of Montana (E.D. Mo.)
Case category
Constitutional Claims (US) → Fourteenth Amendment (US)Constitutional Claims (US) → Other Constitutional Claims (US)
Principal law
United States → Fourteenth Amendment—Due ProcessUnited States → Fourth AmendmentUnited States → Horizontal Separation of PowersUnited States → State Law—Miscellaneous Statutes → New York Climate Leadership and Community Protection ActUnited States → Supremacy Clause
At issue
Constitutional challenge to New York's regulations establishing a Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
05/14/2026
Complaint filed.
Iowa, Missouri, and the American Free Enterprise Chamber of Commerce filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the Eastern District of Missouri against the New York Attorney General and the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) challenging the Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program established by NYSDEC in a rule promulgated in December 2025. The plaintiffs alleged that New York’s rule imposes reporting requirements, compliance costs, and potential criminal and civil penalties for activity occurring outside New York, including requirements for fuel suppliers such as ethanol and biodiesel producers and distributors to report the amount of liquid fuel that may be sold in New York regardless of where the initial sale or production occurs. The complaint asserted that New York’s rule violated the U.S. Constitution’s prohibition on extraterritorial state regulation and was preempted by the Clean Air Act. They also asserted that the rule violated the due process rights of persons and companies by subjecting them to regulatory jurisdiction even though they lack “minimum contacts” with New York related to the conduct subject to the rule. In addition, they asserted that the rule violated the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches by authorizing NYSDEC to conduct warrantless inspection of real property at which an emission source exists.
Complaint
–
Summary
Constitutional challenge to New York's regulations establishing a Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance