Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Jacob v. Bloom Energy Corp.

Geography
Year
2020
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2020
Status
Judgment entered in favor of defendant with respect to one plaintiff and in favor of a second plaintiff.
Docket number
2020-0023-JRS
Court/admin entity
United StatesState CourtsDelaware Court of Chancery (Del. Ch.)
Case category
Securities and Financial Regulation (US)State Law Claims (US)Other Types of State Law Cases (US)
Principal law
United StatesDelaware General Corporation Law
At issue
Lawsuit to compel company to allow stockholders to inspect books and records for multiple purposes, including to investigate potential misrepresentations regarding performance of "green energy" technology.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
02/25/2021
Judgment entered in favor of defendant with respect to one plaintiff and in favor of a second plaintiff.
The Delaware Chancery Court ordered Bloom Energy Corporation to respond to a stockholder’s demand to inspect the company’s books and records, including documents relating to the company’s clean energy claims and the company’s carbon dioxide emissions. According to the court’s decision, the company manufactures solid-oxide fuel cells that provide an alternative to obtaining energy from the electrical grid, and the company’s primary product is the Bloom Energy Server, which the company promotes as supplying more efficient energy generation with lower greenhouse gas emissions than traditional fossil fuels. After a report published in 2019 concluded that the technology was neither profitable nor clean, the two plaintiffs submitted their demands for inspection. Although the court ruled for the company with respect to one of the plaintiff’s demands, due to failure to comply with statutory requirements for such demands, the court found that the other plaintiff had carried his burden of demonstrating a “proper purpose” for inspection by presenting a credible basis to suspect wrongdoing, including with respect to the company’s representations regarding its product’s environmental benefits.
Decision

Summary

Lawsuit to compel company to allow stockholders to inspect books and records for multiple purposes, including to investigate potential misrepresentations regarding performance of "green energy" technology.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance