- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- John R. Lawson Rock & Oil, Inc. v. State Air Resources Board
John R. Lawson Rock & Oil, Inc. v. State Air Resources Board
Geography
Year
2014
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2014
Status
Opinion issued affirming trial court's judgment that CARB violated CEQA and California's Administrative Procedures Act.
Geography
Docket number
F074003
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Court of Appeals (Cal. Ct. App.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Challenge to amendments to California’s on-road heavy-duty diesel vehicle standards.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
01/31/2018
Opinion issued affirming trial court's judgment that CARB violated CEQA and California's Administrative Procedures Act.
The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment that the California Air Resources Board (CARB) violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and California’s Administrative Procedures Act (APA) when it promulgated revised truck and bus regulations that extended compliance deadlines for small fleet operators. The truck and bus regulations are intended to reduce emissions of particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and greenhouse gases from large diesel engines. The appellate court concluded that CARB violated CEQA by approving the project before it had completed its environmental analysis and by failing to consider the petitioners’ “fair argument” that emissions would increase compared to emissions under the existing regulations and that the increases could be significant. The court also affirmed the trial court’s determination that CARB’s conduct violated the APA. The appellate court did not agree, however, with the trial court’s conclusion that CARB used an inappropriate baseline; the appellate court stated that CARB “was within its discretion to adopt a baseline calculation that measured the current environment without further reducing figures based on regulations that should have taken effect during the course of the analysis.”
Decision
–
Summary
Challenge to amendments to California’s on-road heavy-duty diesel vehicle standards.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance