Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Maryland Clean Energy Center v. United States

Geography
Year
2025
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2025
Status
Defendant's motion to stay granted.
Docket number
1:25-cv-01738
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States Court of Federal Claims (Fed. Cl.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United StatesBreach of Covenant of Good Faith and Fair DealingUnited StatesContract LawUnited StatesInflation Reduction Act of 2022United StatesOne Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)United StatesTucker Act
At issue
Breach of contract action brought by state recipients of grants under the Solar for All program after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's termination of the program.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
01/21/2026
Defendant's motion to stay granted.
The Court of Federal Claims granted the United States’ motion to stay all proceedings in a breach of contract action brought by state recipients of grants under the Solar for All program after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) termination of the program. The United States argued in its motion to stay that principles of judicial economy favored a stay because “a virtually identical group” of state plaintiffs had filed a case in federal district court in Washington seeking a declaration that termination of the Solar for All grants was unlawful. The plaintiffs opposed the stay, contending that the United States was attempting to “have it both ways” by seeking the stay while simultaneously telling the district court that only the Court of Federal Claims had jurisdiction to hear the plaintiffs’ claims. The Court of Federal Claims granted the U.S.’s motion from the bench after oral argument on January 21, 2026 and imposed the stay until April 21, 2026. The court directed the parties to file a status report by April 13 addressing progress in the district court litigation and steps the Court of Federal Claims must take in this case.
Decision
01/09/2026
Supplemental response filed by plaintiffs in opposition to defendant's motion to stay.
Response
01/09/2026
Supplemental brief filed in support of defendants' motion to stay.
Brief
12/11/2025
Response filed by plaintiffs in opposition to defendant's motion to stay.
Response
10/15/2025
Complaint filed.
State recipients of grants under the Solar for All program filed a breach of contract action in the Court of Federal Claims alleging that EPA’s cancellation of the Solar for All program and unilateral termination of grant agreements constituted “a clear, unambiguous, and material breach of the agreements.” The complaint alleged that EPA acted based on an erroneous interpretation of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act as rescinding all appropriations related to Solar for All, not just “unobligated balances.” The plaintiffs contended that this basis for terminating the grants was also erroneous as a matter of contract law because the interpretation did not constitute grounds for termination under the grant agreements’ express terms and conditions. The complaint also asserted a breach of the grant agreements’ implied duty of good faith and fair dealing.
Complaint

Summary

Breach of contract action brought by state recipients of grants under the Solar for All program after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's termination of the program.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance