Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Ministry of Environment and Forestry v. PT Jatim Jaya Perkasa

Geography
Year
2015
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2015
Status
Decided
Court/admin entity
Indonesia → North Jakarta District Court
Case category
Suits against corporations, individuals (Global) → Corporations (Global) → Climate damage (Global)
Principal law
Indonesia → Law 32/2009 Environmental Protection and Management
At issue
Restoration for climate damage caused by palm plantation land clearing.
Topics
, ,  

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
07/18/2016
The district court of North Jakarta ruled in favor of the plaintiff.
Decision
–
06/15/2016
The Jakarta Court of Appeal upheld the district court rulings.
Decision
–

Summary

On March 23, 2015, the Indonesian Ministry of Environment and Forestry (the MoEF) sued a company of palm oil plantation, namely PT Jatim Jaya Perkasa, for fires occurring covering an area of 1000 hectares. the MoEF argued that the defendant had failed to comply with obligations of having preventive and fires control facilities within its controlled area. Moreover, the plaintiff also argued that the defendant had intentionally set fires on its land for the purpose of making it as the new crop field. Therefore, the plaintiff asked the court to declare that the defendant had conducted an unlawful act and to pay compensation of IDR 371.1 billion for restoration cost and damages. For climate-related damages, the MoEF requested compensation for carbon release and losses of carbon sinks. The MoEF ask the the defendant to pay for compensation of IDR 810 million (9000 tC released) and IDR 283.5 million (3150 tCO2 reduced). On June 15, 2016, the District Court of North Jakarta ruled in favor of the plaintiff and held the defendant liable for damages and restoration cost from wildfires in its controlled area. On March 17, 2017, the Jakarta Court of Appeal upheld the district court rulings but annulled the amount of cost which decided by the district court. The Jakarta Court of Appeal held that the fires affected 1000 hectares of concessions area as the plaintiff mentioned on its petition. On June 28, 2018, the Supreme Court upheld the appeal court ruling and rejected the cassation from the defendant.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance